v30.3-roots.1 · Commit 3: [PATCH 03/68] feat(policy): preserve Roots relay and network controls on Core 30.3
src/test/rbf_tests.cpp
Before: src/test/rbf_tests.cpp · After: src/test/rbf_tests.cpp
File metadata
index 31cf994c875e5c7df4947cf64b6e3cc4a61661af..135f0786f359bc2cddc86d974fde4bb2e4f20a1d 100644
Download original patch · Release notes
Diff rows 1–34 of 34. Line numbers refer to the original before/after files.
+ Added− RemovedUnmarked lines are context.
Scroll the code area horizontally to read long lines. Before is on the left; after is on the right. Unified view fits narrow screens more easily.
src/test/rbf_tests.cpp
CHANGED
|
@@ -216,18 +216,26 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(rbf_helper_functions, TestChain100Setup)
|
|
| 216 |
BOOST_CHECK(PaysMoreThanConflicts(set_34_cpfp, CFeeRate(entry4_high->GetModifiedFee(), entry4_high->GetTxSize()), unused_txid).has_value());
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
// Tests for EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint
|
| 219 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(empty_set, {tx1->GetHash()}, unused_txid) == std::nullopt);
|
| 220 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {tx3->GetHash()}, unused_txid) == std::nullopt);
|
| 221 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint({entry2_normal}, {tx2->GetHash()}, unused_txid).has_value());
|
| 222 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {tx1->GetHash()}, unused_txid).has_value());
|
| 223 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {tx2->GetHash()}, unused_txid).has_value());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 224 |
// EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint does not calculate descendants of iters_conflicting; it uses whatever
|
| 225 |
// the caller passed in. As such, no error is returned even though entry2_normal is a descendant of tx1.
|
| 226 |
-
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint({entry2_normal}, {tx1->GetHash()}, unused_txid) == std::nullopt);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
// Tests for PaysForRBF
|
| 229 |
-
const CFeeRate incremental_relay_feerate{DEFAULT_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE};
|
| 230 |
-
const CFeeRate higher_relay_feerate{2 * DEFAULT_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE};
|
| 231 |
// Must pay at least as much as the original.
|
| 232 |
BOOST_CHECK(PaysForRBF(/*original_fees=*/high_fee,
|
| 233 |
/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee,
|
|
|
|
| 216 |
BOOST_CHECK(PaysMoreThanConflicts(set_34_cpfp, CFeeRate(entry4_high->GetModifiedFee(), entry4_high->GetTxSize()), unused_txid).has_value());
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
// Tests for EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint
|
| 219 |
+
bool violates_policy{false};
|
| 220 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(empty_set, {{tx1->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy) == std::nullopt);
|
| 221 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 222 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {{tx3->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy) == std::nullopt);
|
| 223 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 224 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint({entry2_normal}, {{tx2->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy).has_value());
|
| 225 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 226 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {{tx1->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy).has_value());
|
| 227 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 228 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint(set_12_normal, {{tx2->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy).has_value());
|
| 229 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 230 |
// EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint does not calculate descendants of iters_conflicting; it uses whatever
|
| 231 |
// the caller passed in. As such, no error is returned even though entry2_normal is a descendant of tx1.
|
| 232 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(EntriesAndTxidsDisjoint({entry2_normal}, {{tx1->GetHash(), true}}, unused_txid, &violates_policy) == std::nullopt);
|
| 233 |
+
BOOST_CHECK(!violates_policy);
|
| 234 |
+
// TODO: Add tests for policy-only conflicts
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
// Tests for PaysForRBF
|
| 237 |
+
const CFeeRate incremental_relay_feerate{CORE_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE};
|
| 238 |
+
const CFeeRate higher_relay_feerate{2 * incremental_relay_feerate};
|
| 239 |
// Must pay at least as much as the original.
|
| 240 |
BOOST_CHECK(PaysForRBF(/*original_fees=*/high_fee,
|
| 241 |
/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee,
|